2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On parameterized block triangular preconditioners for generalized saddle point problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The eigenvalue estimates for AP −1 were provided, which improve some theoretical results appeared in the previous works such as [7,10]. When j < 0, the bounds for the real part of all the eigenvalues of AP −1 were mainly discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The eigenvalue estimates for AP −1 were provided, which improve some theoretical results appeared in the previous works such as [7,10]. When j < 0, the bounds for the real part of all the eigenvalues of AP −1 were mainly discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A special case ofP when j < 0 was studied in [23][24][25]. The ideas of [10] and [22] were combined in [13], resulting in the generalized block triangular preconditioner…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So, a good preconditioner must be given as close as possible to the coefficient matrix. The preconditioners for saddle problems mainly can be considered in these cases, such as, block triangular preconditioners [2,22], block diagonal preconditioners [23][24][25], fully factorized two-by-two block matrix precoditioners [26,27], etc., see [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] for more detailed investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few years, much work also has been devoted to developing efficient preconditioners for saddle point problems. A variety of preconditioners have been proposed and studied in many papers, such as block diagonal and block triangular preconditioners [7,19,20,24], constraint preconditioners [8,25], HSS-based preconditioners [3,6,12,13,30], dimensional split preconditioners [15,16], H−matrix preconditioners [17] and so on. In [14], Benzi, Golub and Liesen discussed a selection of numerical methods and useful preconditioners for saddle point problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%