2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On party-proportional representation under district distortions

Abstract: The paper presents the problem of choosing the representatives in an assembly when the whole electoral region is subdivided into electoral districts. Because of the two dimensions, geographical (districts) and political (parties), the problem is called bi-apportionment. Often the allocation of seats to districts is predetermined and furthermore distorted-meaning that the ratios of the number of assigned seats to population size vary significantly across districts. The paper surveys proposed bi-apportionment me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that the scenario described in Corollary 1, involving 'no split-ticket voting' essentially mirrors a single-vote system. Thus, this outcome is not a novel finding and aligns with the results observed in previous studies of singlevote systems, notably Balinski and Demange (1989b) and Demange (2012). In fact, without resorting to Theorem 1, one could deduce that setting s i j = v i j v x L for all (i, j) ∈ N × M suffices as a solution to the linear system.…”
Section: Corollarysupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to note that the scenario described in Corollary 1, involving 'no split-ticket voting' essentially mirrors a single-vote system. Thus, this outcome is not a novel finding and aligns with the results observed in previous studies of singlevote systems, notably Balinski and Demange (1989b) and Demange (2012). In fact, without resorting to Theorem 1, one could deduce that setting s i j = v i j v x L for all (i, j) ∈ N × M suffices as a solution to the linear system.…”
Section: Corollarysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The foundational work of Balinski and Demange (1989b) introduced the biproportional divisor methods, see also Balinski and Demange (1989a). Additionally, Demange (2012) delved into the challenge of achieving party proportionality, assuming a pre-determined allocation of seats to districts are distorted. Later, Demange 1 Countries using compensatory systems include Germany, South Korea, Italy, Hungary, Bolivia, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, if party-proportional representation is the goal, a simple fact is that party-proportionality cannot be achieved by allocating seats district per district when there are distortions in the district apportionment. This result is independent of any integer requirement (see Demange [2011]). This difficulty is at the root of complex additional features in electoral rules that aim at achieving party-proportionality.…”
Section: Two-step Procedures: Priority To Aggregate Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For experiments conducted in the 2017 presidential election, see 'Voter autrement' https://vote.imag.fr/ and http://www.jugementmajoritaire2017.com/.3 For a recent account of bi-apportionment problems, seeDemange (2012); for a review of electoral systems in various countries, seeSimeone and Pukelsheim (2006).4 The bi-divisor methods could be applied in other contexts than the political one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%