2011
DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2011.566046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Potential-Based and Direct Movements in Information Spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard we have brought together the role of intrinsic dynamics (Kelso, 1995) and the emergence of processes of search in task space that can be independent of the gradient descent properties of the landscape of both task and intrinsic dynamics (Newell et al, 1989). This possibility opens the question on the processes of perception of informational variables that grasp macroscopic properties from task and perceptual-motor workspace that leads to divergent search patterns (e.g., Jacobs et al, 2011; Michaels et al, 2017). It also opens the question as to the learner’s priorities for using information on one level or another in the search process for learning.…”
Section: Closing Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard we have brought together the role of intrinsic dynamics (Kelso, 1995) and the emergence of processes of search in task space that can be independent of the gradient descent properties of the landscape of both task and intrinsic dynamics (Newell et al, 1989). This possibility opens the question on the processes of perception of informational variables that grasp macroscopic properties from task and perceptual-motor workspace that leads to divergent search patterns (e.g., Jacobs et al, 2011; Michaels et al, 2017). It also opens the question as to the learner’s priorities for using information on one level or another in the search process for learning.…”
Section: Closing Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining participants returned to, or continued (if they had not changed variable use during practice), using the nonspecifying informational variable that induced the illusory bias. Possibly, a similar thing happened in the recent work of Jacobs et al (2011), who found only small changes toward a stronger reliance on specifying variables. Because these authors did not report individual trajectories, this may equally well point to only few participants changing their information pickup, rather than to a small change across all or most participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Although ample evidence has shown that practice-even without feedback-may reduce illusory bias (e.g., for the Müller-Lyer illusion; see Eysenck & Slater, 1958;Judd, 1902;Schiano & Jordan, 1990), it has not been directly tested whether this is due to a convergence to specifying informational variables. A recent article by Jacobs et al (2011), however, has provided the proverbial exception: The authors found a marginal reduction in the illusory bias in the perception of the length of the shaft in the Müller-Lyer illusion after a short period of practice with veridical feedback, and suggested that this was likely due to a stronger reliance on length-specifying information 3 ; yet, differences in perceptual accuracy or learning between the participants were not considered. Hence, we hypothesized that a reduction or disappearance of the illusory bias with practice would most likely result from a shift in picking up nonspecifying variables toward a reliance on more useful variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, our portrayal so far argued that learning trajectories are based on vectors, which means that learning is based on detected informational quantities that are as many dimensional as the space that is used to describe the learning. Even from within the framework of direct learning, however, we have tentatively explored the alternative view that learning may be based on single-dimensional potential functions on the space (Jacobs, Iba´n˜ez-Gijo´n, Dı´az, & Travieso, 2011). Figure 4 illustrates this type of analysis for the information space defined in equation 7.…”
Section: Information For Learning: a Dynamic Touch Examplementioning
confidence: 99%