2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2005.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On potential wells and applications to semilinear hyperbolic equations and parabolic equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the argument in [27] we can obtain the following Theorems 3.1-3.3 and Lemma 3.4. Theorem 3.1 shows the invariance of W and V , respectively.…”
Section: Invariant Sets and Vacuum Isolating Of Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…By the argument in [27] we can obtain the following Theorems 3.1-3.3 and Lemma 3.4. Theorem 3.1 shows the invariance of W and V , respectively.…”
Section: Invariant Sets and Vacuum Isolating Of Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Because of this main difficulty, some most effective methods, such as the method of upper and lower solutions, are not valid here anymore. Inspired by the ideas in [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], the threshold results for the global existence and blow-up of the weak solutions are given by the potential well method, the classical Galerkin method, and the logarithmic Sobolev inequality. Further we discuss the non-extinction properties and the asymptotic behavior of the global solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course that is correct, but on page 294 of [11], near the top of the page, Payne and Sattinger rule out this possibility. The remark in [21] may leave the impression that they did not consider this possibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some other incorrect proofs regarding both invariance of the set V and global non-existence (see Lemma 4.2, Theorem 4.3 and Theorem 6.3 in [11]) were pointed out and corrected in [21] by introducing a family of potential wells. In the correction (ii) on page 2667 of [21], the authors indicate that M (t) could always be negative. Of course that is correct, but on page 294 of [11], near the top of the page, Payne and Sattinger rule out this possibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation