1992
DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176348511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Predictive Least Squares Principles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
127
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
127
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where is the maximum likelihood estimator of Σ with given p and cointegrating rank r. Note that the penalty terms of AIC, HQ and SIC are a simple function of a parameter count (K), which increases with p and r. Wei (1992), Phillips and Ploberger (1996), and Chao and Phillips (1999) argue that the coefficients associated with regressors exhibiting a trend should be penalized more strongly than regressors without a trend. Phillips and Ploberger (1996) and Chao and Phillips (1999) propose the use of the posterior information criterion (PIC):…”
Section: Information Criteria and Trace Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where is the maximum likelihood estimator of Σ with given p and cointegrating rank r. Note that the penalty terms of AIC, HQ and SIC are a simple function of a parameter count (K), which increases with p and r. Wei (1992), Phillips and Ploberger (1996), and Chao and Phillips (1999) argue that the coefficients associated with regressors exhibiting a trend should be penalized more strongly than regressors without a trend. Phillips and Ploberger (1996) and Chao and Phillips (1999) propose the use of the posterior information criterion (PIC):…”
Section: Information Criteria and Trace Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are [22,10,13,25,17]. In all these papers it is shown that either the regret or the redundancy grows as k 2 ln n + o(ln n), either in expectation or almost surely.…”
Section: Main Result Informallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the term inside the expectation further we first Taylor approximate f (x n ) around µ n =μ(x n ), for given x n with (µ * −μ n ) 2 < a 2 n = 1/ √ n. We get f (x n ) = −(µ * −μ n ) d dµ ln Mμ n (x n ) + n 1 2 (µ * −μ n ) 2 I(µ n ), (25) where I is the Fisher information (as defined in Section 7) and µ n lies in between µ * andμ, and depends on the data x n . Since the first derivative of µ at the ML estimateμ is 0, the first-order term is 0.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of time series, Wax (1988) derived the weak consistency of an analogous estimator of the order of an autoregressive process without the Gaussian assumption, and Hemerly and Davis (1989) strengthened it to the a.s. consistency. Moreover, Wei (1992) obtained the a.s. consistency and asymptotic expansions of APE under stochastic regression models. Now we turn to selection rules based on the residual sum of squares, which is RSS~(k) = E~ rt,n(k) 2 where the ordinary residuals rt,~,(k) are defined above.…”
Section: Ape Stochastic Complexity and Fpementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, the equivalence of BIC and APE has been shown by Hannah et el. (1989) for the finite-dimensional autoregressive models and by Wei (1992) for finite-dimensional stochastic regression models. (ii) If k* < K, and liminf(21oglogn)-lc~n > 2, we have, for some 7 > 2, pr(/~n > k*) _< O((logn) -'y) as n -~ cx~.…”
Section: Ape Stochastic Complexity and Fpementioning
confidence: 99%