2001
DOI: 10.3366/jvc.2001.6.1.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Print Culture: the State We're In

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2001, Laurel Brake’s essay ‘On Print Culture: The State We’re In’ took measure of a field of research that had emerged following the diminution of numerous disciplinary boundaries and the development of new forms of digital technology. Although the appropriate name for this multidisciplinary field was matter for debate (Periodical studies?…”
Section: Print Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2001, Laurel Brake’s essay ‘On Print Culture: The State We’re In’ took measure of a field of research that had emerged following the diminution of numerous disciplinary boundaries and the development of new forms of digital technology. Although the appropriate name for this multidisciplinary field was matter for debate (Periodical studies?…”
Section: Print Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attention given to periodicals as worthwhile objects of study in their own right sought to undo the retrospective construction of Victorian culture by 20th-century writers with a distaste for commercial forms of art. Brake's essay marked the culmination of several decades of recovery work initiated by such collections as The Victorian Periodical Press: Samplings and Soundings (Shattock 1982), Investigating Victorian Journalism (Brake 1990) and Nineteenth-Century Media and the Construction of Identities (Brake 2000). If these collections succeeded in establishing why it was necessary to recognize the press as the discursive context for the major works of Victorian literature, the debate continues over how to define the exact nature of the relationship between the period's journalism and its literature.…”
Section: Print Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this judgment, I disagree with Laurel Brake who as recently as 2001 announced that the academy was witnessing the genesis of what she called "print culture," in which she included both the press and the book. 5 Perhaps inadvertently, she demeaned the study of the press as a segment of that culture by constantly affirming the media as relational. And here is where I dispute the hypotheses of postmodernism.…”
Section: Re-constructing Media Historymentioning
confidence: 99%