2021
DOI: 10.1017/s026996482100005x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Profitability of Nakamoto Double Spend

Abstract: Nakamoto doublespend strategy, described in Bitcoin foundational article, leads to total ruin with positive probability. The simplest strategy that avoids this risk incorporates a stopping threshold when success is unlikely. We compute the exact profitability and the minimal double spend that is profitable for this strategy. For a given amount of the transaction, we determine the minimal number of confirmations to be requested by the recipient that makes the double-spend strategy non-profitable. This number of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nakamoto's model represents a different paradigm, where double-spending attacks-spending the same amount twice-are unlikely, provided some requirements are met (Grunspan and Pérez-Marco 2018). Such repeated attacks prove to be unprofitable, unless one is ready to double-spend enormous amounts on a regular basis-an unreasonable assumption in practice (Grunspan 2021). This is achieved using the proof of work concept, which originates in the design of spam filters (Dwork and Naor 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nakamoto's model represents a different paradigm, where double-spending attacks-spending the same amount twice-are unlikely, provided some requirements are met (Grunspan and Pérez-Marco 2018). Such repeated attacks prove to be unprofitable, unless one is ready to double-spend enormous amounts on a regular basis-an unreasonable assumption in practice (Grunspan 2021). This is achieved using the proof of work concept, which originates in the design of spam filters (Dwork and Naor 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%