1996
DOI: 10.1137/s0036144593251710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Projection Algorithms for Solving Convex Feasibility Problems

Abstract: Due to their extraordinary utility and broad applicability in many areas of classical mathematics and modem physical sciences (most notably, computerized tomography), algorithms for solving convex feasibility problems continue to receive great attention. To unify, generalize, and review some of these algorithms, a very broad and flexible framework is investigated. Several crucial new concepts which allow a systematic discussion of questions on behaviour in general Hilbert spaces and on the quality of convergen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
1,221
0
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,434 publications
(1,238 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
11
1,221
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the property of being contractive, the nonexpansivity of an operator does not guarantee the convergence of the corresponding Picard iterations. Therefore, we use the stronger notion of an averaged operator, cf., e.g., (Bauschke and Borwein 1996;Byrne 2004;Combettes 2004). By definition, T : H → H is averaged if for a nonexpansive operator R and some α ∈ (0, 1) we can write T as…”
Section: Picard Iterations For the Solution Of Variational Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the property of being contractive, the nonexpansivity of an operator does not guarantee the convergence of the corresponding Picard iterations. Therefore, we use the stronger notion of an averaged operator, cf., e.g., (Bauschke and Borwein 1996;Byrne 2004;Combettes 2004). By definition, T : H → H is averaged if for a nonexpansive operator R and some α ∈ (0, 1) we can write T as…”
Section: Picard Iterations For the Solution Of Variational Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most famous one is the successive projection method for polyhedral sets known as the Agmon-MotzkinSchoenberg algorithm [Agm54,MoS54]. Further examples can be found in the excellent surveys in [BeT89,BaB96,CeZ97]. Such methods can also in some cases be interpreted as subgradient methods for the minimization of a non-differentiable convex function over a closed convex set (e.g., [Gof78]), several methods for which also use projections onto level sets of convex functions or surrogate linearized subgradient inequalities (as in "poor man's bundle methods"); see, for example, the level methods in [LNN95,Kiw96a,Kiw96b], references found therein, and [Bra93, pp.…”
Section: Euclidean Projectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, therefore, a sequential block-projection algorithm, an instance of a widely used projection technique (PT) for solving the convex feasibility problem (Bauschke & Borwein, 1996;García-Palomares, 1994), and its convergence properties are well understood (Bauschke & Borwein, 1996;Flåm & Zowe, 1990;García-Palomares, 1998.…”
Section: Psvm Iterationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Projection techniques have become a successful approach for solving convex systems (See for instance Bauschke & Borwein, 1996;Butnariu, Censor, & Reich, 2001;Censor & Zenios, 1997 and references therein). The main objective of this paper is to demonstrate that projection techniques yield an efficient approach to SVM classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%