1971
DOI: 10.5951/mt.64.1.0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Proofs of the Irrationality of √2

Abstract: In This paper there are given thirteen proofs that √2 is irrational. Indications are given as to whether the method employed extends to proving the irrationality of other square roots or of roots of higher order. In addition, a reference is provided to an incorrect proof recently published and its criticism.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Irrationality of √ 2 via decimals? Many proofs of irrationality of the number √ 2 were published and collected, e.g., Beigel [4], Bogomolny [5] (at least 19 on-line proofs), Flannery [16], Gardner [19] (lists 18 references), Harris [24] (13 proofs), Miller and Montague [32], Myerson [33], Subbarao [42], and Waterhouse [44], and many textbooks on algebra, mathematical analysis and number theory present such proof: Allouche and Shallit [1, Theorem 2.2.1], Apostol [2, Theorem 1.10], Hardy and Wright [23,Theorem 43], Jarník [26, str. 16], Pugh [34, p. 11], Tao [43,Proposition 4.4.4], Zorich [45,p.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrationality of √ 2 via decimals? Many proofs of irrationality of the number √ 2 were published and collected, e.g., Beigel [4], Bogomolny [5] (at least 19 on-line proofs), Flannery [16], Gardner [19] (lists 18 references), Harris [24] (13 proofs), Miller and Montague [32], Myerson [33], Subbarao [42], and Waterhouse [44], and many textbooks on algebra, mathematical analysis and number theory present such proof: Allouche and Shallit [1, Theorem 2.2.1], Apostol [2, Theorem 1.10], Hardy and Wright [23,Theorem 43], Jarník [26, str. 16], Pugh [34, p. 11], Tao [43,Proposition 4.4.4], Zorich [45,p.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%