1986
DOI: 10.2307/3550667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Proving Discrimination: Statistical Methods and Unfolding Policy Logics

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This relied on the circumstantial evidence provided by the unequal outcomes of the recruitment process. As in other jurisdictions, anti-discrimination legislation reduces the incidence of overt discrimination (or at least makes it more difficult to prove), and as a result, courts have relied increasingly on circumstantial evidence, such as the differences between applicant and appointee populations (Knopff, 1986). In undisputed evidence, the Tribunal heard that after considering 750 applicants for cabin crew employment in the period September 2001 to September 2002, Virgin Blue had employed only one person who was aged over 35 years.…”
Section: The Legal Case Of Hopper and Others Vs Virgin Bluementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relied on the circumstantial evidence provided by the unequal outcomes of the recruitment process. As in other jurisdictions, anti-discrimination legislation reduces the incidence of overt discrimination (or at least makes it more difficult to prove), and as a result, courts have relied increasingly on circumstantial evidence, such as the differences between applicant and appointee populations (Knopff, 1986). In undisputed evidence, the Tribunal heard that after considering 750 applicants for cabin crew employment in the period September 2001 to September 2002, Virgin Blue had employed only one person who was aged over 35 years.…”
Section: The Legal Case Of Hopper and Others Vs Virgin Bluementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legislation 2009;Australian Legislation 2009;Hunter 1992;Knopff 1986]. Direct discrimination consists of rules or procedures that explicitly impose "disproportionate burdens" on minority or disadvantaged groups.…”
Section: Modelling the Process Of Direct Discrimination Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general principle in discrimination laws is to consider group representation [Knopff 1986] as a quantitative measure of the qualitative requirement that people in a group are treated "less favorably" [European Union Legislation 2009; U.K. Legislation 2009] than others, or such that "a higher proportion of people without the attribute comply or are able to comply" [Australian Legislation 2009] to a qualifying criteria. We observe that (see Lemma A.9):…”
Section: α-Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of the two frequencies, namely 2, will be later on defined as a measure of discrimination. If a ratio of 2 would be deemed unacceptable by the law, and the provided input pool would be representative of the underlying population [14], we could conclude that the DSS decisions have discriminatory effects for women living in the area ZIP = 101. Although the DSS logic has no explicit discriminatory intent, its analyses are not complete enough to prevent what is known in the literature as indirect or systematic discrimination.…”
Section: Dss As a Black-boxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, we [14] as a quantitative measure of the qualitative requirement that people in a group are treated "less favorably" [8,28] than others, or such that "a higher proportion of people without the attribute comply or are able to comply" [2] to a qualifying criteria. We recall from [19] the notion of extended lift, a measure of the increased confidence in concluding an assertion C resulting from adding (potentially discriminatory) information A to a rule B → C where no PD itemset appears.…”
Section: Measures Of Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%