1998
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-49380-8_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Public-Key Steganography in the Presence of an Active Warden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this subsection can be seen as providing an implementation of the "supraliminal channel" postulated by Craver [6]. Indeed, Craver's observation that the adversary's transformations should be restricted to those which do not significantly impact human interpretation of the images (because the adversary should not unduly burden "innocent" correspondents) is what leads to the applicability of our hard AI problems.…”
Section: An Application: Robust Image-based Steganographymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The results of this subsection can be seen as providing an implementation of the "supraliminal channel" postulated by Craver [6]. Indeed, Craver's observation that the adversary's transformations should be restricted to those which do not significantly impact human interpretation of the images (because the adversary should not unduly burden "innocent" correspondents) is what leads to the applicability of our hard AI problems.…”
Section: An Application: Robust Image-based Steganographymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…No satisfying formal model for public-key steganography with active attacks has been published so far, although the subject was discussed by several authors, and some systems with heuristic security have been proposed [8,2]. A crucial element that seems to make our formalizations useful is the restriction of the stage-two decoding oracle depending on the challenge covertext.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difficulty led to the introduction, of the supraliminal channel by Cravar [8] as a better way for authorship protection. A supraliminal channel is defined as "a low bandwidth channel that the intruder cannot afford to modify as it uses the most significant components of the object as a means of transition".…”
Section: Digital Watermarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A supraliminal channel is defined as "a low bandwidth channel that the intruder cannot afford to modify as it uses the most significant components of the object as a means of transition". It becomes in practice impossible for the intruder to alter the message as he/she must either allow the message through or censor it [8]. The effect of this technique is to turn an active warden, who tries to remove the watermark with different attacks, to a passive warden, who cannot change or delete the watermark.…”
Section: Digital Watermarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%