2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10670-020-00340-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Putnam’s Proof of the Impossibility of a Nominalistic Physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 We will also assume this syntactical structure-counting criterion for many-sorted theories and employ generalized translations as well. Barrett (2023) has applied his parsimony principle to choose between nominalistic and Platonistic physical theories. He analyzes the requirement of Putnam (1971) that a nominalistic physical theory must interpret standard Platonistic theories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 We will also assume this syntactical structure-counting criterion for many-sorted theories and employ generalized translations as well. Barrett (2023) has applied his parsimony principle to choose between nominalistic and Platonistic physical theories. He analyzes the requirement of Putnam (1971) that a nominalistic physical theory must interpret standard Platonistic theories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barrett (2023) has applied his parsimony principle to choose between nominalistic and Platonistic physical theories. He analyzes the requirement of Putnam (1971) that a nominalistic physical theory must interpret standard Platonistic theories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%