2018
DOI: 10.1111/jmcb.12476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Quality and Variety Bias in Aggregate Prices

Abstract: How do product variety and quality affect the aggregate price bias? We develop a general equilibrium model that accounts for the joint interaction of product quality and variety. Our findings show that the aggregate price bias is procyclical and the contribution of product variety is persistent whereas the contribution of product quality becomes countercyclical in the medium to long run. We show that accounting for product quality and variety has critical implications on the measure of cyclical fluctuations. M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hamano and Zanetti (2018) establish the relevance of quality and variety bias for aggregate prices in a model with firm entry and exit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Hamano and Zanetti (2018) establish the relevance of quality and variety bias for aggregate prices in a model with firm entry and exit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Since our model abstracts from quality upgrading, it fails to account for this important channel that surely entails relevant welfare effects. In a recent paper,Hamano and Zanetti (2017) develop a model with quality upgrading and endogenous entry and exit of firms that can be extended to study the welfare effect of a fall in product destruction in the presence of quality upgrading. The investigation of this issue is certainly an interesting extension for future research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow Ghironi and Melitz (2005) and calibrate the elasticity of substitution between goods θ = 3.8 and the shape parameter of the productivity Pareto distribution κ = 3.4. As in Hamano and Zanetti (2018), we calibrate the steady state fixed costs f and the exogenous exit rate δ to match U.S. exit and entry rates. According to the Business Dynamics Statistics (BDS), average annual exit and entry rates were 10.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%