“…where > 0 is a small constant, depending only on n, s and the ellipticity constants of the metric g. (ii) If s ∈ (0, 1/2), there is a large constant C M,s,n > 1 depending on M, s, n such that we have ∂ n+1 b = 0 = ∂ n+1 c for y ∈ M × [0, C M,s,n ] . Then in deriving the estimate (50) of Lemma 5.1 in [Rü17], it is possible to argue along the same lines as in the proof of Proposition 5.13. All constants (in particular the constant in (50) in [Rü17]…”