2016
DOI: 10.1090/tran/6758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On quantitative unique continuation properties of fractional Schrödinger equations: Doubling, vanishing order and nodal domain estimates

Abstract: Abstract. In this article we determine bounds on the maximal order of vanishing for eigenfunctions of a generalized Dirichlet-to-Neumann map (which is associated with fractional Schrödinger equations) on a compact, smooth Riemannian manifold, (M, g), without boundary. Moreover, with only slight modifications these results generalize to equations with C 1 potentials. Here Carleman estimates are a key tool. These yield a quantitative three balls inequality which implies quantitative bulk and boundary doubling es… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where > 0 is a small constant, depending only on n, s and the ellipticity constants of the metric g. (ii) If s ∈ (0, 1/2), there is a large constant C M,s,n > 1 depending on M, s, n such that we have ∂ n+1 b = 0 = ∂ n+1 c for y ∈ M × [0, C M,s,n ] . Then in deriving the estimate (50) of Lemma 5.1 in [Rü17], it is possible to argue along the same lines as in the proof of Proposition 5.13. All constants (in particular the constant in (50) in [Rü17]…”
Section: 33mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where > 0 is a small constant, depending only on n, s and the ellipticity constants of the metric g. (ii) If s ∈ (0, 1/2), there is a large constant C M,s,n > 1 depending on M, s, n such that we have ∂ n+1 b = 0 = ∂ n+1 c for y ∈ M × [0, C M,s,n ] . Then in deriving the estimate (50) of Lemma 5.1 in [Rü17], it is possible to argue along the same lines as in the proof of Proposition 5.13. All constants (in particular the constant in (50) in [Rü17]…”
Section: 33mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We outline the argument for Lemma 5.1 in [Rü17] under the conditions (i), (ii): To this end, we first note that the Carleman estimate in Proposition 5.7 remains valid for operators of the form x 1−2s n+1 ∇ · g∇ + ∂ n+1 x 1−2s n+1 ∂ n+1 , where g is a smooth, uniformly elliptic, symmetric tensor field, which only depends on the tangential directions. This is a consequence of the structure of the proof of Proposition 5.7, in which the tangential and the normal components (of the commutators) decoupled, and the possibility to adjust the constant γ > 0.…”
Section: 33mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let Remark. After having completed the paper, we learn that A. Rüland just considered some similar problems for fractional Schrödinger equations [17] using a different method.…”
Section: Zhumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also established a certain boundary version of the vanishing order estimate. Finally, we refer to the paper [52] for an interesting generalisation to nonlocal equations of the quantitative uniqueness result in [6], and also to [8] for a generalisation to Carnot groups of arbitrary step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%