On Quantitizing

Abstract

Quantitizing, commonly understood to refer to the numerical translation, transformation, or conversion of qualitative data, has become a staple of mixed methods research. Typically glossed are the foundational assumptions, judgments, and compromises involved in converting disparate data sets into each other and whether such conversions advance inquiry. Among these assumptions are that qualitative and quantitative data constitute two kinds of data, that quantitizing constitutes a unidirectional process essentially different from qualitizing, and that counting is an unambiguous process. Among the judgments are deciding what and how to count. Among the compromises are balancing numerical precision with narrative complexity. The standpoints of “conditional complementarity,” “critical remediation,” and “analytic alternation” clarify the added value of converting qualitative data into quantitative form.

Pharmaceutical Services in Primary Health Care: are pharmacists and users on the same page?

“…This procedure was adopted in order to add clarification, facilitate pattern recognition and extract meaning from data 26 . The variables generated by this process were grouped as "viewpoints" and organized in the domains "infrastructure and service organization" of the PHCPS and "dispensing practices and medicine availability".…”

Personal Factors Associated with Reported Benefits of Huntington Disease Family History or Genetic Testing

“…All data were entered into the NVivo (2008) software program for data management. The data were quantified to reduce them in a manner to optimize descriptive, interpretive, and internal validity (Maxwell, 1992;Sandelowski et al, 2009), and they focused on the range of experiences of reported benefits. Three members of the research team sorted statements that were similar into distinct categories.…”

How do Catalan Students Narrate the History of Catalonia When They Finish Primary Education?

“…Although this process of quantification has been criticized because of its significant losses of variance (Sandelowski, 2009), we considered it appropriate to summarize the data analyzed by means of the normative and narrative content analysis.…”