2001
DOI: 10.1109/18.915636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On quantum detection and the square-root measurement

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, we consider the problem of constructing measurements optimized to distinguish between a collection of possibly nonorthogonal quantum states. We consider a collection of pure states and seek a positive operator-valued measure (POVM) consisting of rank-one operators with measurement vectors closest in squared norm to the given states. We compare our results to previous measurements suggested by Peres and Wootters [11] and Hausladen et al.[10], where we refer to the latter as the square-ro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
298
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(303 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
298
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem has also been solved in the context of quantum detection [9] and in the context of general inner product shaping [6]; the solution in [6,9] is equal to the OMF signals corresponding to the set transformation given by (11). We may then interpret the OMF demodulator as a correlation demodulator matched to a set of orthonormal signals that are closest in the least-squares sense to the signals s k (t).…”
Section: Omf Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This problem has also been solved in the context of quantum detection [9] and in the context of general inner product shaping [6]; the solution in [6,9] is equal to the OMF signals corresponding to the set transformation given by (11). We may then interpret the OMF demodulator as a correlation demodulator matched to a set of orthonormal signals that are closest in the least-squares sense to the signals s k (t).…”
Section: Omf Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the POMF demodulator consists of a MF demodulator followed by an optimal subspace whitening transformation given by (9). Note, that in Fig.…”
Section: The Projected Orthogonal Matched ÿLter Demodulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations