2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12220-010-9171-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Radial and Conical Fourier Multipliers

Abstract: We investigate connections between radial Fourier multipliers on R d and certain conical Fourier multipliers on R d+1 . As an application we obtain a new weak type endpoint bound for the Bochner-Riesz multipliers associated with the light cone in R d+1 , where d ≥ 4, and results on characterizations of L p → L p,ν inequalities for convolutions with radial kernels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the Bochner-Riesz problem, little is known for the local smoothing estimate for the wave operator and the cone multiplier problem. See [1,7] and [3,5,6,10] for the Bochner-Riesz and the cone multiplier problems, respectively.…”
Section: Introduction and Statements Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the Bochner-Riesz problem, little is known for the local smoothing estimate for the wave operator and the cone multiplier problem. See [1,7] and [3,5,6,10] for the Bochner-Riesz and the cone multiplier problems, respectively.…”
Section: Introduction and Statements Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In low-dimensional cases d 1 = 2, 3, 4 and d 2 = 1, the most recent results in this direction are due to Garrigós and Seeger [1], and Garrigós et al [2]. And in high-dimensional cases d 1 ≥ 5 and d 2 = 1, the results are due to Heo [3], and Heo et al [4,5]. See also [6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introduction and Statements Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the case d 1 ≥ 4, d 2 = 1 was already studied in [5] by Heo et al to describe the technical and geometrical differences between the cases d 2 = 1 and d 2 ≥ 2, we treat the case d 2 = 1 again in Section 3. In fact the result for the case d 1 ≥ 4, d 2 = 1 and λ > λ(p) can be deduced from the estimate (2.5) which was the main inequality of [4].…”
Section: Introduction and Statements Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact (2.8) can be deduced from Heo's results by the standard Carleson-Sjölin reduction and asymptotic expansion for kernels as before (see Lemma 2.1 and [21]). Alternatively, the estimate without even ϵ-loss can also be deduced from sharp local smoothing estimate for the wave equation which is obtained in [13] 1 (also see [22]). …”
Section: Lemma 23 Let B J Be a Smooth Function In Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…+ f by following the argument in [22] (the proof of Corollary 1.3). 2 Hence, in particular, (3.10) holds for 1 < p < 2d d+3 when d ≥ 3.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 12mentioning
confidence: 99%