2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0195-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Re-Ranking and Explanatory Adequacy in a Constraint-Based Theory of Phonological Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OT has sometimes been criticized for not being able to solve a paradox in diachronic phonology: a grammar will only change if the child has a different input from the previous generation --but the previous generation will only provide such a different set of forms if it already has a different grammar (see e.g. McMahon, 2000 andGess, 2003).…”
Section: Grammar Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…OT has sometimes been criticized for not being able to solve a paradox in diachronic phonology: a grammar will only change if the child has a different input from the previous generation --but the previous generation will only provide such a different set of forms if it already has a different grammar (see e.g. McMahon, 2000 andGess, 2003).…”
Section: Grammar Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…as a corresponding perceptual output), we rely on approaches grounded in the reception and processing of speech as the source of change (see e.g. Gess 2003;Jun 1995a;1995b;Russell Webb and Bradley 2009). This is especially important as it concerns the effect of positional prominence (Beckman 1998;Steriade 2001;Wright 2001Wright , 2004.…”
Section: Sound Change As a Speaker-listener Conspiracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides that no constraint holds at the level of input and implies that all grammars should contend with all possible input. The present approach assumes full specification at a lexical evaluative level, which is filtered by declarative constraints (see Myers, 1999;Gess, 2003Gess, , 2004. Itô, Mester and Padgett (1995) demonstrate that OT's non-derivational framework denies any serial ordering or minimalism, providing that underspecification is an output -rather than an input -property.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reader is referred toHayes, Kirchner and Steriade (2004),Hayes (2004) andLindblom (2006) for more complete discussion of the issues surrounding the phonetics -phonology divide and the place of phonetically based constraints within contemporary phonological theory. 12 Similar constraints have been formalized as * Gesture(Boersma, 1998) and Conserve Articulatory Effort(Gess, 2003(Gess, , 2004, inter alia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%