2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfi.2018.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On reaching for yield and the coexistence of bubbles and negative bubbles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nemoto [23] finds that credit availability positively affects prices, and thus the more credit is supplied the higher the asset prices. Acharya and Naqvi [24] also verify that monetary loosening induces investors to higher returns and as a result to bubble amplification. Wang et al [25] study the banking stability in conjunction with asset bubbles.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Nemoto [23] finds that credit availability positively affects prices, and thus the more credit is supplied the higher the asset prices. Acharya and Naqvi [24] also verify that monetary loosening induces investors to higher returns and as a result to bubble amplification. Wang et al [25] study the banking stability in conjunction with asset bubbles.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We start by examining whether term structure variables predict reaching for yield by corporate bond funds. Theoretically, Feroli et al (2014) and Acharya and Naqvi (2015) show that asset managers reach for yield when interest rates are low. But it is an open empirical question whether fund managers are actually more likely to engage in reaching for yield in low interest rate environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar spirit to our paper, Lian et al (2019) conclude that US household investment decisions are characterised by reaching for yield when monetary policy is expansive (low short- 3 In theoretical models of the risk-taking channel of monetary policy, a reduction in the policy rate causes higher risk-taking by financial institutions, resulting in lower risk premia and amplifying the magnitude of the interest rate cut. These models highlight the role of leverage (Adrian and Shin, 2010), funding conditions (Drechsler et al, 2018), and institutional frictions (Acharya and Naqvi, 2019). Moreover, some financial institutions, such as pension funds, have long-term liabilities which, when discounted at low interest rates, are increasingly difficult to be met unless more risk is taken on the asset side through higher yielding investments (Lucas and Zeldes, 2009;Rajan, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%