2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10444-018-9592-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On reduced input-output dynamic mode decomposition

Abstract: The identification of reduced-order models from high-dimensional data is a challenging task, and even more so if the identified system should not only be suitable for a certain data set, but generally approximate the input-output behavior of the data source. In this work, we consider the input-output dynamic mode decomposition method for system identification. We compare excitation approaches for the data-driven identification process and describe an optimization-based stabilization strategy for the identified… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it is intrinsically related to the Koopman operator analysis, see [31]. Moreover, DMD can be used to simultaneously identify an input operator [36,37], and an output operator [2,9]. Additionally in [18], the authors propose the DMD with control incorporation of quadratic-bilinear terms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is intrinsically related to the Koopman operator analysis, see [31]. Moreover, DMD can be used to simultaneously identify an input operator [36,37], and an output operator [2,9]. Additionally in [18], the authors propose the DMD with control incorporation of quadratic-bilinear terms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ensures stability of solutions for future times as there are no growing modes. For input-output systems, DMD has also been modified through a postprocessing algorithm to generate a stable input-output model [15]. These methods show that DMD architectures can be imbued with advantageous stability properties for ROMs.…”
Section: Dynamic Mode Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is tested in two variants: First, in a symmetric setting with zero flow speed v = 0, and second, in a non-normal setting with a flow speed v = 0.5. Due to the MIMO nature of the system we use the average system (see (4)) for the error indicator computation. This set of experiments is organized in the same manner as Section 4.1, but conducted for the prescribed projection errors ε ∈ {10 −2 , .…”
Section: Convection Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%