2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4405(01)00081-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Refining Theoretical Models of Emergent Literacy The Role of Empirical Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
110
0
44

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
110
0
44
Order By: Relevance
“…As we consider the specificity of learning and the simple view of reading (Hoover & Gough, 1990;Senechal & LeFevre, 2001;Storch & Whitehurst, 2002), these results suggest that specificity of learning may be more explicit in nature for children with weaker language and literacy skills than for children with stronger language and literacy skills. In this study, meaning-focused activities had a positive relation with our code-focused outcome for students with stronger vocabulary skills but not for our students with weaker vocabulary skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As we consider the specificity of learning and the simple view of reading (Hoover & Gough, 1990;Senechal & LeFevre, 2001;Storch & Whitehurst, 2002), these results suggest that specificity of learning may be more explicit in nature for children with weaker language and literacy skills than for children with stronger language and literacy skills. In this study, meaning-focused activities had a positive relation with our code-focused outcome for students with stronger vocabulary skills but not for our students with weaker vocabulary skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As a result, most of the research on metacognitive knowledge is primarily restricted to the declarative knowledge, which is often measured through using a self-reported questionnaire (Sénéchal, LeFevre, Smith-Chant, & Colton, 2001). …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it is clear that teachers both recognize and implement much more oral language activities than reading and writing emergent literacy activities. Sénéchal, LeFevre, Smith-Chant, and Colton (2001) stress that this is understandable since oral language activities can be explored in the context of rather informal contexts of interpersonal relationships while letter knowledge, mapping sound to words and reading or printing must have a high structure and intentionality (Sénéchal et al, 2001;Whitehurst, 2001). Beatty (1995) and Schickedanz (1994) believe that the primacy of socioemotional development is in line with a strong tradition in preschool/kindergarten teacher education that concurrently deemphasizes letter recognition, writing or word sound manipulation, despite their significance for learning to read (Adams, 1990;Ehri, 1997;Gunn, Simmons & Kameenui, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%