2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2010.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On relation of the long period galactic cosmic rays intensity variations with the interplanetary magnetic field turbulence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide at least an acceptable accuracy for the calculated value of γ we used carefully selected appropriate NMs for each chosen period of solar activity. Siluszyk (2009, 2010) calculated the annual average values of ν y and ν z by the method given in Appendix B. This method (which we call the first method) assumes the same frequency interval f = f 2 − f 1 = 3 × 10 −6 Hz and constant resonant frequencies Table 1 Neutron monitors used to calculate γ , denoted by '+' in the analysis periods.…”
Section: Observational Data and Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To provide at least an acceptable accuracy for the calculated value of γ we used carefully selected appropriate NMs for each chosen period of solar activity. Siluszyk (2009, 2010) calculated the annual average values of ν y and ν z by the method given in Appendix B. This method (which we call the first method) assumes the same frequency interval f = f 2 − f 1 = 3 × 10 −6 Hz and constant resonant frequencies Table 1 Neutron monitors used to calculate γ , denoted by '+' in the analysis periods.…”
Section: Observational Data and Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The top panel shows the GCR intensity variations J from Moscow neutron monitor data rescaled to free space using the coupling coefficients by Yasue et al (1982) and Alania, Iskra, and Siluszyk (2010). In the entire period of 1968 -2002, there exists a clear negative correlation between J and γ (correlation coefficient r = −0.62 ± 0.12) and a positive correlation between SSN and γ (r = 0.70 ± 0.11), in spite of some time delays between the peaks and valleys in J , SSN, and γ of individual 11-year cycles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations