2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4912420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On relative controllability of delayed difference equations with multiple control functions

Abstract: An n-dimensional linear difference equation with a delay and a vector control function is considered. An equivalent condition for relative controllability is stated, and a complete characterization of control functions is given. Moreover, a sufficient condition for relative controllability of weakly nonlinear difference equation is proved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the controllability problem, due to the infinite-dimensional nature of the dynamics of neutral functional differential equations and difference equations, several different notions of controllability can be used, such as exact, approximate, spectral, or relative controllability [5,30]. Relative controllability has been originally introduced in the study of control systems with delays in the control input [5,20,27], but this notion has later been extended and used to study also systems with delays in the state [13,29] and in more general frameworks, such as for stochastic control systems [19] or fractional integro-differential systems [2]. The main idea of relative controllability is that, instead of controlling the state x t : [−r, 0] → C d of (1.1), defined by x t (s) = x(t + s), in a certain function space such as C k ([−r, 0], C d ) or L p ((−r, 0), C d ), where r ≥ max j∈ 1,N Λ j , one controls only the final state x(t) = x t (0).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the controllability problem, due to the infinite-dimensional nature of the dynamics of neutral functional differential equations and difference equations, several different notions of controllability can be used, such as exact, approximate, spectral, or relative controllability [5,30]. Relative controllability has been originally introduced in the study of control systems with delays in the control input [5,20,27], but this notion has later been extended and used to study also systems with delays in the state [13,29] and in more general frameworks, such as for stochastic control systems [19] or fractional integro-differential systems [2]. The main idea of relative controllability is that, instead of controlling the state x t : [−r, 0] → C d of (1.1), defined by x t (s) = x(t + s), in a certain function space such as C k ([−r, 0], C d ) or L p ((−r, 0), C d ), where r ≥ max j∈ 1,N Λ j , one controls only the final state x(t) = x t (0).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative controllability and its related problems of linear systems represented by different type delay systems have been studied in literature . In particular, rank and Kalman criteria for relative controllability are studied extensively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the infinite-dimensional nature of the dynamics of difference equations and neutral functional differential equations, several different notions of controllability can be used, such as approximate, exact, spectral, or relative controllability [34,5,12,31,24]. Relative controllability was originally introduced in the study of control systems with delays in the control input [5] and consists in controlling the value of x(T ) ∈ C d at some prescribed time T .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative controllability was originally introduced in the study of control systems with delays in the control input [5] and consists in controlling the value of x(T ) ∈ C d at some prescribed time T . In the context of difference equations of the form (1.1), it was characterized in some particular situations with integer delays in [12,31], with a complete characterization on the general case provided in [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%