2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40590-022-00472-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On relative monogeneity of a family of number fields defined by $$X^{p^n}+aX^{p^s}-b$$

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• M. E. Charkani and A. Deajim [26] (see also A. Deajim and L. El Fadil [28]) x p − m over number fields • M. Sahmoudi and M. E. Charkani [148] considered relative pure cyclic extensions • A. Soullami, M. Sahmoudi and O. Boughaleb [150] x 3 n + ax 3 s − b over number fields • O. Boughaleb, A. Soullami and M. Sahmoudi [23] x p n + ax p s − b over number fields • H. Smith [152] relative radical extensions • S. K. Khanduja and B. Jhorar [138] give equivalent versions of Dedekind criterion in general rings • S. Arpin, S. Bozlee, L. Herr and H. Smith [5], [6] study monogenity of number rings from a modul-theoretic perspective • R. Sekigawa [149] constructs an infinite number of cyclic relative extensions of prime degree that are relative monogenic…”
Section: The Relative Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• M. E. Charkani and A. Deajim [26] (see also A. Deajim and L. El Fadil [28]) x p − m over number fields • M. Sahmoudi and M. E. Charkani [148] considered relative pure cyclic extensions • A. Soullami, M. Sahmoudi and O. Boughaleb [150] x 3 n + ax 3 s − b over number fields • O. Boughaleb, A. Soullami and M. Sahmoudi [23] x p n + ax p s − b over number fields • H. Smith [152] relative radical extensions • S. K. Khanduja and B. Jhorar [138] give equivalent versions of Dedekind criterion in general rings • S. Arpin, S. Bozlee, L. Herr and H. Smith [5], [6] study monogenity of number rings from a modul-theoretic perspective • R. Sekigawa [149] constructs an infinite number of cyclic relative extensions of prime degree that are relative monogenic…”
Section: The Relative Casementioning
confidence: 99%