2017 IEEE 4th International Conference Actual Problems of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Developments (APUAVD) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/apuavd.2017.8308790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On reliability of log-spectral distortion measure in speech quality estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some parameters are tested to assess system capability in detecting, identifying, and retrieving attacked frames. These parameters are: a) Log spectrum distortion (LSD) measures the distortion in both watermarked and recovered signals [26]. b) Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some parameters are tested to assess system capability in detecting, identifying, and retrieving attacked frames. These parameters are: a) Log spectrum distortion (LSD) measures the distortion in both watermarked and recovered signals [26]. b) Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b with c, d, e, and f, it is obvious that the stationary white noise became highly non-stationary after the processing of DNNs, so that this kind of noise is referred to as artificial noise. Herein, a log-spectral distortion (LSD) measurement was conducted to test the speech quality degradation, where the LSD was calculated as [43] To further analyze and validate that the residual noise of the aforementioned DNNs is disturbing to a human listener, a psychoacoustic model was introduced to calculate the noise masking threshold of the enhanced speech signals. By taking consideration of the frequency selectivity and the masking property of the human ear, the noise masking threshold was calculated as in [18].…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x o x − x o quantifies the ratio between the energy of the target signal denoted by x o and residual error with an estimate x. In order to complement this signal-domain evaluation by a TF-domain quality measure [43], [44], we compute the Itakura-Saito (IS) divergence [45] using the discrete Fourier transform F of the signals, as…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%