2019
DOI: 10.1109/jsyst.2018.2873891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Residual Energy Maximization in Cognitive Relay Networks With Eavesdropping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system performance is reported here using the typical numerical values of the parameters given in Table 4. [4, 7, 16, 18, 19].…”
Section: Numerical Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The system performance is reported here using the typical numerical values of the parameters given in Table 4. [4, 7, 16, 18, 19].…”
Section: Numerical Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present optimisation problem is solved through the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker method. At the point of optimality, there will be some binding constraints (inequality) and slacks [7]. It is clearly observed that the sensing duration constraint depends on μ5 and μ6.…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Proposed Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, Banerjee et al [41] studied an energy harvesting (EH) based two‐hop relay assisted CR system with minimising secrecy outage probability under some constraints. Banerjee and Maity [42] studied a residual energy maximisation problem on a two‐hop decode‐and‐forward relay‐assisted CRN with an eavesdropper. Banerjee et al [43] studied the maximisation problem of the sum secondary throughput in a cooperative CRN with an eavesdropper as well as EH capability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%