2016
DOI: 10.1145/2822885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Resilience of IoT Systems

Abstract: Editor's IntroductionAt the very high level of abstraction, the Internet of Things (IoT) can be modeled as the hyper-scale, hyper-complex cyber-physical system. Study of resilience of IoT systems is the first step towards engineering of the future IoT eco-systems. Exploration of this domain is highly promising avenue for many aspiring Ph.D. and M.Sc. students.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By independently measuring n x and g, we extract a total heating rate as low as G x /2p = 20.6 ± 2.3 kHz at a pressure of ~10 -6 mbar. This is consistent with the separately measured heating rate due to background gas collisions (18), G gas /2p = 16.1 ± 1.2 kHz, and the expected heating contributions from photon recoil, G rec / 2p ≈ 6 kHz, and from laser phase noise, G phase / 2p < 200 Hz (24). In future experiments, reduction of decoherence can be achieved mainly by lower background pressures, but potentially also by operating at lower temperatures and using smaller cavity mode volumes.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By independently measuring n x and g, we extract a total heating rate as low as G x /2p = 20.6 ± 2.3 kHz at a pressure of ~10 -6 mbar. This is consistent with the separately measured heating rate due to background gas collisions (18), G gas /2p = 16.1 ± 1.2 kHz, and the expected heating contributions from photon recoil, G rec / 2p ≈ 6 kHz, and from laser phase noise, G phase / 2p < 200 Hz (24). In future experiments, reduction of decoherence can be achieved mainly by lower background pressures, but potentially also by operating at lower temperatures and using smaller cavity mode volumes.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…These cavity-cooling schemes have been used in the past to achieve ground-state cooling of various systems ranging from individual atoms to cryogenically cooled modes of solid-state nano-and micromechanical oscillators in the context of cavity optomechanics (14). Previous attempts to apply cavity cooling to levitated solids have proven challenging, and cooling was limited to several hundred phonons (15)(16)(17)(18), mainly as a result of co-trapping associated with high intracavity photon number and excessive laser phase noise heating at low motional frequencies (<1 MHz) (17,18). We apply a modified scheme-cavity cooling by coherent scattering (19-21)-that circumvents these shortcomings and enables direct ground-state cooling of a solid in a roomtemperature environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a system with devices connected to a network, resilience is responsible for maintaining or recovering the communication service between devices, regardless of network failures [110], [111]. The concept of resilience is the system's ability to resist failures [112] using recoverability (survivability), adaptability, and the capacity to manage failures [13]. Network, hardware, or software vulnerabilities can interrupt a system service, so the system must react to these failures when they occur.…”
Section: ) Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, certain terminology-related disagreements exist with regards to definitions and difference between Fog and Edge computing [24]- [26]. Moreover, in some works, a resilience of a system is impractically defined (partially) through the ability of a system to resist various failures [27]. One of the views is that Fog computing can be perceived as an extension of cloud computing [28].…”
Section: Edge and Fog Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%