1960
DOI: 10.1016/0029-554x(60)90101-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On resolution and luminosity of a neutron diffraction spectrometer for single crystal analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where L is the instrumental luminosity (Caglioti et al, 1960;Yessik et al, 1973). Then for any scattering cross section do-/dQ the measured intensity is given by…”
Section: Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where L is the instrumental luminosity (Caglioti et al, 1960;Yessik et al, 1973). Then for any scattering cross section do-/dQ the measured intensity is given by…”
Section: Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (2) and ( It is well established that a good approximation may be obtained by Gaussian transmission functions especially for neutrons (Caglioti et al, 1960;Cooper & Nathans, 1968), but these have also been used for Xrays (Iizumi, 1973). Owing to multiple convolutions this is often true; even though the individual transmission functions are not well represented by Gaussians.…”
Section: Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed angular variation of intensity will differ from Iql 2 because of the finite beam divergence and wavelength distribution of the spectrometer. General methods for introducing the effect of finite resolution of the spectrometer have been developed by Caglioti, Paoletti & Ricci (1960), Caglioti & Ricci (1962), Cooper & Nathans (1968) and other workers. However, a multilayer differs from a mosaic single crystal in some important aspects.…”
Section: Effect Of Finite Resolution Of the Spectrometermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two methods of calculation are possible. In the first method originally used by Caglioti, Paoletti & Ricci (1958, 1960) the calculation is carried out in real space and the result is a distribution of doubly scattered neutrons as a function of counter and specimen angle. In the second method adopted by Cooper & Nathans (1968)(CN) the calculation is carried out in reciprocal space and the result is an exponential distribution of probability of neutron transmission as a function of Q, the momentum transferred to the neutron from the system during the collision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%