2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2010.00348.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On: Responding to Rachel Blass’ article ‘Affirming “That’s not psycho‐analysis!” On the value of the politically incorrect act of attempting to define the limits of our field’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3As a recent example of such debates, see the four critical Letters to the Editor (by Lewis Aron, 2010; Yoram Hazan, 2010; Emanuel Berman, 2010; and Steven Stern, 2010), stirred by Rachel Blass’ (2010a) paper titled “Affirming ‘That’s not psycho-analysis!’: On the value of the politically incorrect act of attempting to define the limits of our field” (see also Blass’ [2010b] reply and my comment [Migone, 2011]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3As a recent example of such debates, see the four critical Letters to the Editor (by Lewis Aron, 2010; Yoram Hazan, 2010; Emanuel Berman, 2010; and Steven Stern, 2010), stirred by Rachel Blass’ (2010a) paper titled “Affirming ‘That’s not psycho-analysis!’: On the value of the politically incorrect act of attempting to define the limits of our field” (see also Blass’ [2010b] reply and my comment [Migone, 2011]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%