2003
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-03-03364-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On restrictions of modular spin representations of symmetric and alternating groups

Abstract: Abstract. Let F be an algebraically closed field of characteristic p and H be an almost simple group or a central extension of an almost simple group. An important problem in representation theory is to classify the subgroups G of H and FH-modules V such that the restriction V ↓ G is irreducible. For example, this problem is a natural part of the program of describing maximal subgroups in finite classical groups. In this paper we investigate the case of the problem where H is the Schur's double coverÂn orŜn.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Main Theorem substantially strengthens Theorem A of [Kleshchev and Tiep 2004], which in turn strengthened [Wagner 1977], and fits naturally into the program of describing small dimension representations of quasisimple groups. For representations of symmetric and alternating groups results along these lines were obtained in [James 1983] and [Brundan and Kleshchev 2001b, Section 1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Main Theorem substantially strengthens Theorem A of [Kleshchev and Tiep 2004], which in turn strengthened [Wagner 1977], and fits naturally into the program of describing small dimension representations of quasisimple groups. For representations of symmetric and alternating groups results along these lines were obtained in [James 1983] and [Brundan and Kleshchev 2001b, Section 1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Here we review some known results on representation theory ofn and ᐁ n described in detail in [Kleshchev 2005, Chapter 22] following [Brundan and Kleshchev 2001a;. It is important that the different approaches of these last two papers are reconciled in [Kleshchev and Shchigolev 2012], where some additional branching results, which will be crucial for us here, are also established.…”
Section: S N and Omentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Factorizations of irreducible characters of alternating and symmetric groups and their Schur covers into Kronecker products of irreducible characters are very rare. The relevant references are Kleshchev and Bessenrodt [8], [9] and [10] as well as Kleshchev and Tiep [25]. It is an open question as to which of these factorizations do in fact lead to C 4obstructions.…”
Section: ±1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work of Kleshchev, Sin, Tiep [24] goes a long way towards solving the branching problems when = 2 or 3 and G = A n or S n . Kleshchev and Tiep [25] nearly obtained a complete solution in the case G = 2.A n or 2.S n and < n.…”
Section: ±1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For alternating groups, apart for some cases in in characteristic 2, non-trivial tensor products have been classified in [5,7,37,38,46]. For covering groups of symmetric and alternating groups however only partial results are known, that is the characteristic 0 case for S n , see [4,8], as well as some reduction results obtained in [34] for S n and A n in characteristic ≥ 5. In this paper we will consider the case where G = S n or A n is a covering group of a symmetric or alternating group and completely classify non-trivial irreducible tensor products in characteristic = 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%