2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On risk management of shipping system in ice-covered waters: Review, analysis and toolbox based on an eight-year polar project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research method used in this study uses the ISO 31000: 2018 method which begins with risk identification, risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk management [36][37][38]. The data analysis technique used is descriptive quantitative.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research method used in this study uses the ISO 31000: 2018 method which begins with risk identification, risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk management [36][37][38]. The data analysis technique used is descriptive quantitative.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…loading, modelling and conditions), weathering and transport of oil, response and recovery, and evacuation and rescue. 33 As discussed further below, the current POLARIS does not yet adequately address the research shortages in these key areas.…”
Section: Inherent Risks Associated With Arctic Shippingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of validation raises questions about the reliability and applicability of the models (Bergström et al., 2022; Zhang, Zhang, et al., 2020). Because there is limited data and information available on Arctic navigation, expert judgments and knowledge play a crucial role in assessing safety risks (Fu et al., 2021; Lu et al., 2022). However, these expert judgments and knowledge cannot be accurately reproduced using the models in the current studies to predict the risk associated with unseen environmental data (Fu et al., 2021; Rae & Alexander, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the related studies about assessment of Arctic navigation risk have certain limitations (Mazaheri et al., 2016; Montewka et al., 2022). These studies were developed based on accident statistics and expert judgments (Fu et al., 2022; Jones et al., 2023; Lu et al., 2022). The risk assessment models in most of these studies were not validated by actual data of Arctic navigation (Cao et al., 2022; Guo et al., 2022; Vanhatalo et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2022), which casts doubt on the robustness and generalization ability of the models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%