2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13398-015-0267-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Schachermayer and Valdivia results in algebras of Jordan measurable sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The inequality (6) is a particular case of (11). Finally from (12) with i = r we get (8) because each (i np , j np ) verifies that r = i np n p j np .…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The inequality (6) is a particular case of (11). Finally from (12) with i = r we get (8) because each (i np , j np ) verifies that r = i np n p j np .…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…, N n+1,k n+1 . At least one of this subsets, named N n+1 verifies that we get that lim s→∞ μ i ms , j ms (A) = ∞, in contradiction with (10).…”
Section: N P and For An Infinity Of Values Of Nmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Previous related results can be found in [5,14]. An example of an algebra A such that A is a web Nikodým set for ba(A ) is given in [10].…”
Section: Nikodým Set For Ba(σ)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koszmider and Shelah have shown in [13] that if an infinite algebra A has the so-called Weak Subsequential Separation Property then the cardinal of A is greater than or equal to the continuum c. Since all algebras considered here have the Weak Subsequential Separation Property, it arises the natural question whether there exist algebras with the Nikodým property with cardinality less than c. This question has been solved positively by Sobota in [25]. On the other hand, in [14,Theorem 1] it was proved that the algebra J (K) of Jordan measurable subsets of the compact interval [27,Theorem 4]. Note that |J (K)| = 2 c , where |A| denotes the cardinality of the set A. Valdivia asked in [27,Problem 1] whether the equivalence (N) ⇔ (sN) holds for an algebra A of sets which is not a σ-algebra.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 97%