2010
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2009.2033971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Seismic Response of Substation Equipment and Application of Base Isolation to Transformers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the great extent of damage to equipment and structures observed after recent earthquakes, substations are often considered to be the most vulnerable components in a power grid . The seismic performance of individual pieces of equipment and structures has recently undergone extensive study, and some modern techniques have been developed and applied to improve their seismic performance . Nevertheless, the seismic reliability of the entire substation system remains unclear because of its high degree of redundancy and physical interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the great extent of damage to equipment and structures observed after recent earthquakes, substations are often considered to be the most vulnerable components in a power grid . The seismic performance of individual pieces of equipment and structures has recently undergone extensive study, and some modern techniques have been developed and applied to improve their seismic performance . Nevertheless, the seismic reliability of the entire substation system remains unclear because of its high degree of redundancy and physical interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The seismic performance of individual pieces of equipment and structures has recently undergone extensive study, [5][6][7][8][9][10] and some modern techniques have been developed and applied to improve their seismic performance. [11][12][13] Nevertheless, the seismic reliability of the entire substation system remains unclear because of its high degree of redundancy and physical interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of the friction pendulum systems (FPS) in mitigating the seismic responses of the transformer‐bushing system was investigated. It revealed that the base isolation reduced the inertia forces about 85% for the transformer and at least 50% and as high as 95% for the bushing . The seismic reduction of the wire rope isolators and the FPS were also compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It revealed that the base isolation reduced the inertia forces about 85% for the transformer and at least 50% and as high as 95% for the bushing. [12] The seismic reduction of the wire rope isolators and the FPS were also compared. The testing results indicated that the wire rope isolators would reduce the maximum acceleration by 30% and the force by 20%, whereas the FPS did by 60% and 70%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kong compared the effectiveness of the WRI and the FPS for seismic mitigation of bushings and concluded that the WRI would reduce the maximum acceleration by 30% and the force by 20% whereas the FPS did by 60% and 70%, separately. Ala Saadeghvaziri and Feizi also numerically investigated the efficiency of the FPS for seismic reduction of transformer‐bushing system. The results indicated that the inertia forces could be reduced about 85% for the transformer and at least 50% and as high as 95% for the bushing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%