2005
DOI: 10.1007/11554028_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Self-organising Diagnostics in Impact Sensing Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, the study conducted by Omenzetter formulated a vector seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model for the recorded strain data through which unusual events as well as structural change or damage sustained by the structure could be revealed [11]. In addition to these methods, some artificial intelligence methods such as neural networks, fuzzy processing, genetic algorithms and combinations of these methods have been proposed to handle such problems [12][13][14][15]. However, real-time assessment and low data storage requirements are still expected for any practical solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the study conducted by Omenzetter formulated a vector seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model for the recorded strain data through which unusual events as well as structural change or damage sustained by the structure could be revealed [11]. In addition to these methods, some artificial intelligence methods such as neural networks, fuzzy processing, genetic algorithms and combinations of these methods have been proposed to handle such problems [12][13][14][15]. However, real-time assessment and low data storage requirements are still expected for any practical solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%