2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.11.063
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On sharp constants for dual Segal–Bargmann Lp spaces

Abstract: We study dilated holomorphic L p space of Gaussian measures over C n , denoted H n p,α with variance scaling parameter α > 0. The duality relations (H n p,α ) * ∼ = H p ′ ,α hold with 1 p + 1 p ′ = 1, but not isometrically. We identify the sharp lower constant comparing the norms on H p ′ ,α and (H n p,α ) * , and provide upper and lower bounds on the sharp upper constant. We prove several suggestive partial results on the sharpness of the upper constant. One of these partial results leads to a sharp bound on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This theorem can also be used to obtain the estimate (1.6) of Theorem 1.2 of [8], which deals with a similar question for the Segal-Bargmann space. Note that the dependence of p is suppressed by the way the Segal-Bargmann norm depends on p. We will address this topic in more detail in the final section of the paper.…”
Section: Motivating Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This theorem can also be used to obtain the estimate (1.6) of Theorem 1.2 of [8], which deals with a similar question for the Segal-Bargmann space. Note that the dependence of p is suppressed by the way the Segal-Bargmann norm depends on p. We will address this topic in more detail in the final section of the paper.…”
Section: Motivating Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To adapt Theorem 2.2 to the Segal-Bargmann case, note that for 0 < p < ∞ the L p -norm of F p γ actually comes from F 2 γp/2 . Thus, since the case p = ∞ is obvious, we can easily obtain the sharp bound |f (z)| ≤ e (γ/2)|z| 2 f F p γ , which is the formula (1.6) of [8], see also Theorem 2.8 [21]. To be completely honest, the case 0 < p < ∞ also needs part of the argument from [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%