2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40863-021-00246-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On sheaf cohomology and natural expansions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reader may consult the definitions in [Wei94] and [Bor94b], here we only observe that having an abelian category with enough injective objects gives enough structure to define (co)homology as right/left derived functors of a left/right exact functor. This is true even for the "abelian form" of Grothendieck toposes, as one may check in [Gro63], [Joh77], on in our survey [TM21] about sheaf cohomology.…”
Section: Sheaf Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reader may consult the definitions in [Wei94] and [Bor94b], here we only observe that having an abelian category with enough injective objects gives enough structure to define (co)homology as right/left derived functors of a left/right exact functor. This is true even for the "abelian form" of Grothendieck toposes, as one may check in [Gro63], [Joh77], on in our survey [TM21] about sheaf cohomology.…”
Section: Sheaf Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This can be done by brute force or by pretending that  is 𝑆𝑒𝑡. Since there is an equivalence 𝐴𝑏(𝑆𝑒𝑡) ≃ 𝐴𝑏, the proof follows from the fact that 𝐴𝑏 is an abelian category, see [Joh77] or [TM21]). Thus, the Soundness Theorem exempts us from 10 pages of calculations, which are done in [Şte81].…”
Section: 𝐹 (𝑈 ) ∏mentioning
confidence: 99%