2015
DOI: 10.1111/sapm.12084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Shock Reflection–Diffraction in a van der Waals Gas

Abstract: The problem of a weak shock, reflected and diffracted by a wedge, is studied for the two-dimensional compressible Euler system. Some recent developments are overviewed and a perspective is presented within the context of a real gas, modeled by the van der Waals equation of state. The regular reflection configuration and the detachment criterion are studied in the light of real gas effects. Some basic features of the phenomenon and the nature of the self-similar flow pattern are explored using asymptotic expans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for any value of ã lying in the interval 0 ≤ ã < 1, there exists a critical value b * of b, such that for values of b lying in the interval (0, b * ) the strength of the compressive shock decreases (see Figure1(b)), whereas it increases for values of b lying in the interval ( b * , 1/3); see Figure1(c). This result is very much consistent with the conclusions arrived at in[11]. Moreover, the shape of the forward facing shock (see Figures2(a) and 2(b)) as well as its decay rate (see Figures 1(a), 1(b), and 1(c)) are also influenced by the parameters ã and b.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, for any value of ã lying in the interval 0 ≤ ã < 1, there exists a critical value b * of b, such that for values of b lying in the interval (0, b * ) the strength of the compressive shock decreases (see Figure1(b)), whereas it increases for values of b lying in the interval ( b * , 1/3); see Figure1(c). This result is very much consistent with the conclusions arrived at in[11]. Moreover, the shape of the forward facing shock (see Figures2(a) and 2(b)) as well as its decay rate (see Figures 1(a), 1(b), and 1(c)) are also influenced by the parameters ã and b.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%