2017
DOI: 10.1090/proc/13682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On $\sigma $-countably tight spaces

Abstract: Abstract. Extending a result of R. de la Vega, we prove that an infinite homogeneous compactum has cardinality c if either it is the union of countably many dense or finitely many arbitrary countably tight subspaces. The question if every infinite homogeneous and σ-countably tight compactum has cardinality c remains open.We also show that if an arbitrary product is σ-countably tight then all but finitely many of its factors must be countably tight.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This refines a theorem of De la Vega [12]. In the case where the cardinal invariants involved are countable, this also represents a variation of a theorem of Juhász and van Mill [15]. Third, we show that if X is a T1 space, wt(X) ≤ κ, X is κ +compact, and ψ(D, X) ≤ 2 κ for any D ⊆ X satisfying |D| ≤ 2 κ , then a) d(X) ≤ 2 κ and b) X has at most 2 κ -many Gκ-points.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This refines a theorem of De la Vega [12]. In the case where the cardinal invariants involved are countable, this also represents a variation of a theorem of Juhász and van Mill [15]. Third, we show that if X is a T1 space, wt(X) ≤ κ, X is κ +compact, and ψ(D, X) ≤ 2 κ for any D ⊆ X satisfying |D| ≤ 2 κ , then a) d(X) ≤ 2 κ and b) X has at most 2 κ -many Gκ-points.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…In Theorem 4.1 a closing-off argument is used to show that if X is T 1 , κ is a cardinal, wt(X) ≤ κ, X is κ + -compact, and ψ(D, X) ≤ 2 κ for any D ⊆ X satisfying |D| ≤ 2 κ , then d(X) ≤ 2 κ and there are at most 2 κ -many G κ -points. This result is related to Lemma 3.2 in [15] and produces an alternative proof that |X| ≤ 2 L(X)wt(X)ψ(X) for a Hausdorff space X.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations