2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00440-004-0396-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On singularity of energy measures on self-similar sets

Abstract: We provide general criteria for energy measures of regular Dirichlet forms on self-similar sets to be singular to Bernoulli type measures. In particular, every energy measure is proved to be singular to the Hausdorff measure for canonical Dirichlet forms on 2-dimensional Sierpinski carpets.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The space of all harmonic functions is denoted by H. For any w ∈ W * and h ∈ H, ψ * w h ∈ H. By using the linear map ι : l(V 0 ) ∋ u → h ∈ H, we can identify H with l(V 0 ). In particular, H is a finite dimensional subspace of F , and the norm · F on H is equivalent to (ι 5) which is also considered as a square matrix of size #V 0 . Let I be the set of all constant functions on K, which is a one-dimensional subspace of H. Let Q be an arbitrary projection operator from H to I.…”
Section: 3])mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The space of all harmonic functions is denoted by H. For any w ∈ W * and h ∈ H, ψ * w h ∈ H. By using the linear map ι : l(V 0 ) ∋ u → h ∈ H, we can identify H with l(V 0 ). In particular, H is a finite dimensional subspace of F , and the norm · F on H is equivalent to (ι 5) which is also considered as a square matrix of size #V 0 . Let I be the set of all constant functions on K, which is a one-dimensional subspace of H. Let Q be an arbitrary projection operator from H to I.…”
Section: 3])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…existence of derivatives with respect to some self-similar measures. Since self-similar measures and energy measures are mutually singular in many cases ( [5,7]), their result and ours are not comparable. (ii) Even when K is not a self-similar fractal, Theorem 5.4 should hold with suitable modification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure valued Lagrangian takes on the fractal K the role of the Euclidean Lagrangian dL(u, v) = ∇u · ∇v dx. Note, that for most nested fractals, such as the Sierpinski gasket, the Lagrangian L K is not absolutely continuous with respect to the Hausdorff measure µ (see [28], [29], [5], [17] and [18]). Therefore, the Lagrangian approach turns out to be a very powerful tool to define energy forms on these fractals and their deformations.…”
Section: Remark 25mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, for most nested fractals, one can employ only the Lagrangian methods due to the singularity of the Lagrangian with respect to the Hausdorff measure (see [28], [29], [5], [17] and [18]). Note that the "Lagrangian" is also called "energy measure", in particular in Kusuokas papers [28] and [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting observation of Kusuoka ([11], see [2] for another proof) is that these measures are all singular with respect to the standard self-similar measure µ on K (the normalized Hausdorff measure), but they are all absolutely continuous with respect to a single measure ν, called the Kusuoka measure, defined below. See [5] and [6] for more recent singularity results.…”
Section: E(u)mentioning
confidence: 99%