1986
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1986.121.485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On singularity of harmonic measure in space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A quantitative version of this theorem was proved by Lavrentiev in [30]. Due to examples of Bishop and Jones in [8] in the planar case, and of Ziemer in [39] and Wu in [38] in higher dimensions, neither H n | ∂Ω ≪ ω nor ω ≪ H n are true for arbitrary simply connected domains Ω ⊂ R n+1 with H n (∂Ω) < ∞ without imposing additional topological and/or non-topological conditions on ∂Ω. Quantitative mutual absolute continuity of harmonic measure and surface measure in higher dimensions was proven when Ω is a Lipschitz domain by Dahlberg in [12], and when Ω is non-tangentially accessible (NTA) (see Definition 1.9) and ∂Ω is Ahlfors-David regular (ADR, see Definition 1.5) independently by David and Jerison in [14] and by Semmes in [36].…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A quantitative version of this theorem was proved by Lavrentiev in [30]. Due to examples of Bishop and Jones in [8] in the planar case, and of Ziemer in [39] and Wu in [38] in higher dimensions, neither H n | ∂Ω ≪ ω nor ω ≪ H n are true for arbitrary simply connected domains Ω ⊂ R n+1 with H n (∂Ω) < ∞ without imposing additional topological and/or non-topological conditions on ∂Ω. Quantitative mutual absolute continuity of harmonic measure and surface measure in higher dimensions was proven when Ω is a Lipschitz domain by Dahlberg in [12], and when Ω is non-tangentially accessible (NTA) (see Definition 1.9) and ∂Ω is Ahlfors-David regular (ADR, see Definition 1.5) independently by David and Jerison in [14] and by Semmes in [36].…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…They also showed that the result of [58] may fail in the absence of some topological hypothesis (e.g., simple connectedness). Examples constructed in [62] and [63] show that, in higher dimensions, some topological restrictions, even stronger than those needed in the planar case, are required for the absolute continuity of with respect to surface measure to the boundary.…”
Section: One Phase Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bishop and Jones [10] found a uniformly rectifiable set E on the plane and some subset of E with zero arc-length which carries positive harmonic measure relative to the domain R 2 \ E. • Example 3. Wu proved in [44] that there exists a topological ball ⊂ R 3 and a set E ⊂ ∂ lying on a 2-dimensional hyperplane so that Hausdorff dimension of E is 1 (which implies σ (E) = 0) but ω(E) > 0.…”
Section: (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%