2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11225-012-9451-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On some Classes of Heyting Algebras with Successor that have the Amalgamation Property

Abstract: In this paper we shall prove that certain subvarieties of the variety of Salgebras (Heyting algebras with successor) has amalgamation. This result together with an appropriate version of Theorem 1 of [L. L. Maksimova, Craig's theorem in superintuitionistic logics and amalgamable varieties of pseudo-boolean algebras, Algebra i Logika, 16(6):643-681, 1977] allows us to show interpolation in the calculus IP CS(n), associated with these varieties.We use that every algebra in any of the varieties of S-algebras stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, (X(N ⊕ N 0 )) + is not a Heyting algebra with successor because the (ACC) is not satisfied in the poset X(N ⊕ N 0 ). The fact that (X(N ⊕ N 0 )) + is not a Heyting algebra with successor was also mentioned in [6].…”
Section: An Adjunction Between Hil S and Is Smentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, (X(N ⊕ N 0 )) + is not a Heyting algebra with successor because the (ACC) is not satisfied in the poset X(N ⊕ N 0 ). The fact that (X(N ⊕ N 0 )) + is not a Heyting algebra with successor was also mentioned in [6].…”
Section: An Adjunction Between Hil S and Is Smentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, if H is a KM algebra of height n then X(H ) is a poset of height n. If X is a poset of height n, then the set of upsets of X is a KM-algebra of height n (Prop. 2.3 of Castiglioni and San Martín 2011).…”
Section: Km-algebrasmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A moment's reflection shows that the Proposition 1.5 of Castiglioni and San Martín (2011) can be given in a more general way: f is a morphism in SE if and only if f is a strict morphism.…”
Section: Km-algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%