1959
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9904-1959-10349-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On some compositions of Hadamard type in classes of analytic functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ⊗-and •-products appear naturally in functional analysis, for example, in the Bieberbach conjecture for univalent analytic functions [23] and the Polya-Schoenberg conjecture for analytic convex mappings [24].…”
Section: Hadamard Product Of Analytic Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ⊗-and •-products appear naturally in functional analysis, for example, in the Bieberbach conjecture for univalent analytic functions [23] and the Polya-Schoenberg conjecture for analytic convex mappings [24].…”
Section: Hadamard Product Of Analytic Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epstein and Schoenberg [2] exhibited 30 DOUGLAS M. CAMPBELL AND V. SINGH a starlike univalent polynomial whose composition with a nonelementary univalent function was not even locally univalent (but was at most three valent). Finally, Loewner and Netanyahu [7] exhibited two close-to-convex functions whose Hadamard composition is not even locally univalent (but again they were unable to determine if H* contains functions of infinite valence). Loewner and Netanyahu's counterexample is to be contrasted with proof of the Polya-Schoenberg conjecture that f*g is starlike if / and g are starlike.…”
Section: Cf(z) + Zf\z) = (C + L)f(z)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here Robertson [54] has proved that if ffi = 3i(l), then 3C* = 3i(l). It was suggested by several mathematicians that the set *Üi(l) of univalent functions might be closed under the operation (10.3), but this conjecture was killed simultaneously by B. Epstein and I. J* Schoenberg [12], C. Loewner and E. Netanyahu [41 ], and W. K. Hayman [29]. This naturally raises the question of determining the maximum valence for functions in the class 3C*, and the radius of ^-valence for the class 3C*.…”
Section: For Each Positive Integer P and F Or Each Integer K^p There mentioning
confidence: 99%