1973
DOI: 10.1017/s0027763000015725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On some degenerate parabolic equations

Abstract: Let Ω, I be open intervals in Rx = (— ∞ < x < ∞), Rt = (— ∞ < t < ∞) respectively. For a function a(x, t) ∈ C∞(Ω × I), consider the partial differential operator(1.1) .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in [8], we can show that (iv) the second term in the right of (i) is also very regular and becomes smoother in R x x R y x / x I according as μ becomes larger.…”
Section: J -Oomentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As in [8], we can show that (iv) the second term in the right of (i) is also very regular and becomes smoother in R x x R y x / x I according as μ becomes larger.…”
Section: J -Oomentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Introduction. In the article I: [8], we have proved the hypoellipticity of a degenerate parabolic equation of the form:…”
Section: On Some Degenerate Parabolic Equations IImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above proposition and remark imply Proposition 2.1 by the same way as T. Matsuzawa [8]. In fact, let us prove it assuming Proposition 3.1, and Proposition 3.1 will be proved in the following sections.…”
Section: In Fact It Suffices To Check That (P-j)/(lj + I)^p/(l 0 + Lmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…§2 8 An Outline of the Proof of Theorem As mentioned in section I, we shall prove only Theorem-(i), so we assume that 1 0 is a non-negative even integer.…”
Section: In Fact It Suffices To Check That (P-j)/(lj + I)^p/(l 0 + Lmentioning
confidence: 99%