2001
DOI: 10.4153/cjm-2001-036-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Some Exponential Equations of S. S. Pillai

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we establish a number of theorems on the classic Diophantine equation of S. S. Pillai, a x − b y = c, where a, b and c are given nonzero integers with a, b ≥ 2. In particular, we obtain the sharp result that there are at most two solutions in positive integers x and y and deduce a variety of explicit conditions under which there exists at most a single such solution. These improve or generalize prior work of Le, Leveque, Pillai, Scott and Terai. The main tools used include lower bounds… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
112
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
112
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In [3], Bennett handles Theorem A for the case a prime by using results from [14], but this will not work here since we are allowing the exponents x and y to be zero. Instead, we will use a result of Luca [11] on the equation p r ± p s + 1 = z 2 , where p, r, s, and z are positive integers with p prime.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In [3], Bennett handles Theorem A for the case a prime by using results from [14], but this will not work here since we are allowing the exponents x and y to be zero. Instead, we will use a result of Luca [11] on the equation p r ± p s + 1 = z 2 , where p, r, s, and z are positive integers with p prime.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before using lower bounds on linear forms in logarithms in the proof of Theorem 1, we need to justify the use of a ≥ 6 as in [3] by first proving Theorem 1 for the case a prime. In [3], Bennett handles Theorem A for the case a prime by using results from [14], but this will not work here since we are allowing the exponents x and y to be zero.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations