1985
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1985.119.245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On some infinite series of L. J. Mordell and their analogues

Abstract: In this paper we obtain a general reciprocity relation (Theorem 2.1) for a class of double series, from which we deduce several results including two alternating double series for f(3) (where ζ(s) is the Riemann zeta function), which complement a result of L. J. Mordell. Later in the paper, we obtain another reciprocity relation for the double series and also extend our investigations to multiple series.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous paper ( [5]), we give some relation formulas for T (r, s, N − r − s) when N is even. These can be regarded as generalizations of the Subbarao and Sitaramachandrarao formula given in [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a previous paper ( [5]), we give some relation formulas for T (r, s, N − r − s) when N is even. These can be regarded as generalizations of the Subbarao and Sitaramachandrarao formula given in [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…were also considered in [3]. Subbarao and Sitaramachandrarao posed the problem to evaluate S(r, r, r) and R(r, r, r) for any positive integer r. As a partial answer to their problem, we gave an evaluation formula for S(r, r, r) for any positive odd integer r (see [5], Corollary 3), and for R(r, r, r) for any positive odd integer r (see [6], Theorem 3.6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogously, Subbarao and Sitaramachandrarao (see [11]) established the following interesting result:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Remark 1. The above formulas (3.7) and (3.8) are the corrected versions of the corresponding results given in [3] and [11], respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation