2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-4311(02)00053-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On some perspectives for increasing the efficiency of combined cycle power plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the load of 50%, the best efficiency of the combined cycle plant is 54.25%, 4.17% more than that of original value. To Alstom GT26 post-combustion gas turbine combined cycle, the combined cycle efficiency gets even higher (>60%) as Alessandro Franco has analyzed [6].…”
Section: Brayton Cycle With Partial Gas To Gas Recuperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the load of 50%, the best efficiency of the combined cycle plant is 54.25%, 4.17% more than that of original value. To Alstom GT26 post-combustion gas turbine combined cycle, the combined cycle efficiency gets even higher (>60%) as Alessandro Franco has analyzed [6].…”
Section: Brayton Cycle With Partial Gas To Gas Recuperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization of heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) with the use of parallel sections and of limit subcritical conditions (up to 220 bar) is proposed in his another paper. The HRSG optimization is sufficient to obtain combined cycle plant efficiencies of the order of 60% while, joining HRSG optimization with the use of AlstomGT26 gas turbine reheat and gas to gas recuperation can lead the efficiency of the whole plant to the limit value of 65% [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Franco and Casarosa [3] and Franco and Russo [4] compared HRSG systems for one, two and three pressure levels with and without reheat and demonstrated that it is possible to reach an overall efficiency of 60% just by optimizing the steam cycle. Xiang and Chen [5] optimized a reheat three pressure levels HRSG both at a full and a part load, and suggested using a partial recovery of the exhaust gas energy for a temperature exceeding 590°C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The examined thermodynamic schemes were based on the combination of air cooling, intercooling, gas to gas recuperation and reheating [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. For large-scale power generation, greater than 50 MW, it is proven that SBC is the most effective thermodynamic scheme than any other bottoming cycle [21][22][23]. However, for small-scale power gas turbines, generating less than 50 MW, suffering from limited efficiency, ABC can be competitive, thanks to size and economic constraints rendering unfavorable the use of SBC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%