2018
DOI: 10.1515/forum-2018-0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On some problems concerning symmetrization operators

Abstract: In [G. Bianchi, R. J. Gardner and P. Gronchi, Symmetrization in geometry, Adv. Math. 306 2017, 51–88], a systematic study of symmetrization operators on convex sets and their properties is conducted. In the end of their article, the authors pose several open questions. The primary goal of this manuscript is to study these questions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, n − 1}. When ♦ H = F H , fiber symmetrization with respect to H, equality holds in (35) with B = K n n and f = V n if and only if F H K = K. Hence the corresponding conclusion also holds when ♦ H is monotonic, invariant on H-symmetric sets, and invariant under translations orthogonal to H of H-symmetric sets. In particular, it holds when ♦ H = M H , Minkowski symmetrization with respect to H.…”
Section: Extensions and Variants Of Klain's Theoremmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…, n − 1}. When ♦ H = F H , fiber symmetrization with respect to H, equality holds in (35) with B = K n n and f = V n if and only if F H K = K. Hence the corresponding conclusion also holds when ♦ H is monotonic, invariant on H-symmetric sets, and invariant under translations orthogonal to H of H-symmetric sets. In particular, it holds when ♦ H = M H , Minkowski symmetrization with respect to H.…”
Section: Extensions and Variants Of Klain's Theoremmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…for r > 0 and ( 35) is then a consequence of the definition (34) of Ω f . Suppose that f is strictly increasing on B, K ∈ B, and equality holds in (35). Then, in view of (37), we clearly have f (K ∩ rB n ) = f ((♦ H K) ∩ rB n ) for almost all r > 0 and hence, since f is increasing, for all r > 0.…”
Section: Extensions and Variants Of Klain's Theoremmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations