2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2014.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On special unipotent orbits and Fourier coefficients for automorphic forms on symplectic groups

Abstract: Abstract. Fourier coefficients of automorphic representations π of Sp 2n (A) are attached to unipotent adjoint orbits in Sp 2n (F ), where F is a number field and A is the ring of adeles of F . We prove that for a given π, all maximal unipotent orbits that gives nonzero Fourier coefficients of π are special, and prove, under a well acceptable assumption, that if π is cuspidal, then the stabilizer attached to each of those maximal unipotent orbits is F -anisotropic as algebraic group over F . These results stre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 · · · p e l l ) with 2 ≤ k ≤ r also fail to support Θ 2r . Combining this vanishing with Propositions 3.2 and 3.3 of Jiang-Liu [33], we now see that nilpotent orbits of type O ′ = ((2k + 1) 2 p e 1 1 · · · p e l l ) for 2 ≤ k ≤ r also fail to support Θ 2r . This exhausts those orbits O ′ such that either O ′ > O Θ or O ′ and O Θ are not comparable.…”
Section: Vanishing Statementssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 · · · p e l l ) with 2 ≤ k ≤ r also fail to support Θ 2r . Combining this vanishing with Propositions 3.2 and 3.3 of Jiang-Liu [33], we now see that nilpotent orbits of type O ′ = ((2k + 1) 2 p e 1 1 · · · p e l l ) for 2 ≤ k ≤ r also fail to support Θ 2r . This exhausts those orbits O ′ such that either O ′ > O Θ or O ′ and O Θ are not comparable.…”
Section: Vanishing Statementssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The proof relies on global results of Ginzburg-Rallis-Soudry[30] and Jiang-Liu[33]. If we can show that nilpotent orbits of the form O ′ = ((2k)1 2r−2k ) for 2 ≤ k ≤ n do not support Θ 2r , then by[30, Lemma 2.6] , it follows that all orbits of the form…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a symplectic partition p of 2n (that is, odd parts occur with even multiplicities), Denote by p Sp 2n the Sp 2n -expansion of p, which is the smallest special symplectic partition that is bigger than p. In [JL15a], we proved the following theorem which provides a crucial reduction in the proof of Theorem 2.1. Theorem 2.3 (Theorem 4.1 [JL15a]). Let π be an irreducible automorphic representation of Sp 2n (A).…”
Section: The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For definitions of the unipotent group V p,2 and its character ψ p , see [JL15a,Section 2]. Note that the one-dimensional torus H p defined in [JL15a, (2.1)] has elements of the following form H p (t) = diag(A(t), A(t), .…”
Section: Proof Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This proves Parts (3) and (4) of the theorem. The last part (Part (6) of the theorem) follows from Part (5) as consequence of the Fourier coefficients associated to a composite of two partitions as discussed in [9] and [17], which will be briefly discussed before the end of Section 3.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%