2021
DOI: 10.1177/14687941211049318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On staying: Extended temporalities, relationships and practices in community engaged scholarship

Abstract: This article examines the complexity and affordances of staying in ‘the field’. Time as a resource for qualitative research is widely experienced as diminishing. Yet increasingly, academic emphasis is also being placed on the merits of time intensive approaches, like participatory scholarship. This tension raises critical questions about the ethics and practices of collaboration within arguably narrowing parameters. Taking a view from the edges of conventional research practice, this article focuses on staying… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research is often transitory in nature and where participants note the benefits of their involvement within a cathartic or catalytic space, more evidence is needed of long term impact (Zimmermann and Forstmeier, 2020). Where appropriate, Mason (2021) argues for the benefits of ‘staying’ in community engaged scholarship, that is extended connections with field sites beyond a designated research time frame. This practice moves beyond the oftentimes ‘contractual bargains’ we make with our participants, however, it requires rethinking funding and institutional support, particularly time constraints.…”
Section: Rethinking Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research is often transitory in nature and where participants note the benefits of their involvement within a cathartic or catalytic space, more evidence is needed of long term impact (Zimmermann and Forstmeier, 2020). Where appropriate, Mason (2021) argues for the benefits of ‘staying’ in community engaged scholarship, that is extended connections with field sites beyond a designated research time frame. This practice moves beyond the oftentimes ‘contractual bargains’ we make with our participants, however, it requires rethinking funding and institutional support, particularly time constraints.…”
Section: Rethinking Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the neoliberal university, the adoption of neoliberal policies has resulted in a combination of narrowing time regimes and increased demands for productivity that renders research and teaching profitable. This acceleration comes at the expense of more ethical forms of doing research that require a different pace to pursue more horizontal relations and long-term collaboration (Grandia 2015;Mason 2021). Enacting "slowness" in our research can thus be a way of creating the future in the present, and at the same time contributes to the production of double contentions.…”
Section: Slownessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For hooks (2000: 94) realising a love ethic means utilising ‘care, commitment, trust, responsibility, respect and knowledge’ in our everyday lives. This is a framework that connotes not only interpersonal commitments but a willingness to demonstrate qualities – like trustworthiness – that need to be earned, over time (Costas Batlle and Carr, 2021; Mason, 2021). As Prainsack and Buyx (2011: 49) put it, solidarity requires ‘enactments of the willingness to carry costs to assist others’.…”
Section: The Civiact Development Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Academia, for instance, is increasingly described as a field permeated by neoliberal logics of competition and individualised pressures to secure the resources to do funded research and benefit from the associated capital and esteem (Edwards, 2022; Mountz et al, 2015). As Mason (2021) has highlighted elsewhere, these are pressures that produce the paradoxical effect of valorising community engaged scholarship whilst undermining the conditions necessary to realise its potential ( see also Heney and Poleykett, 2021; Williams et al, 2020).…”
Section: University-community Partnerships As ‘Fields Of Paradox’mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation