2006
DOI: 10.1080/00927870600860791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Strongly Clean Matrix and Triangular Matrix Rings

Abstract: A ring R is uniquely (strongly) clean provided that for any a ∈ R there exists a unique idempotent e ∈ R ∈ comm(a) such that a − e ∈ U (R). Let R be a uniquely bleached ring. We prove, in this note, that R is uniquely clean if and only if R is abelian, and Tn(R) is uniquely strongly clean for all n ≥ 1, if and only if R is abelian, Tn(R) is uniquely strongly clean for some n ≥ 1. In the commutative case, the more explicit results are obtained. These also generalize the main theorems in [6] and [7], and provide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of nonstrongly clean 2 × 2 matrices over a commutative local ring can be found in [10,11]. Recently, it was proved by Chen, Yang and Zhou in [4] that for each prime p, M 2 (Z (p) ) is not strongly clean, where Z (p) is the localization of Z at the prime ideal generated by p. In another recent paper [3], the same authors investigated when a 2 × 2 matrix ring M 2 (R) over a commutative local ring R is strongly clean, and they obtained a simple criterion for such a matrix ring to be strongly clean. However, their criterion cannot be used to determine whether an individual matrix A in M 2 (R) is strongly clean when the matrix ring M 2 (R) is not necessarily strongly clean.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Examples of nonstrongly clean 2 × 2 matrices over a commutative local ring can be found in [10,11]. Recently, it was proved by Chen, Yang and Zhou in [4] that for each prime p, M 2 (Z (p) ) is not strongly clean, where Z (p) is the localization of Z at the prime ideal generated by p. In another recent paper [3], the same authors investigated when a 2 × 2 matrix ring M 2 (R) over a commutative local ring R is strongly clean, and they obtained a simple criterion for such a matrix ring to be strongly clean. However, their criterion cannot be used to determine whether an individual matrix A in M 2 (R) is strongly clean when the matrix ring M 2 (R) is not necessarily strongly clean.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, Camillo-Khurana [13] proved that unit regular rings are all clean, so Nicholson asked By [29], matrix rings over clean rings are still clean, but it is unknown if eRe is clean in case R is clean and e 2 = e ∈ R. In [37], Nicholson asked In her unpublished manuscript [40], Sánchez Campos proved that if R is strongly clean and e 2 = e ∈ R, then eRe is strongly clean. Later, two different proofs appeared in [17] and [20], respectively. Theorem 3.4 ([17, 20, 40]) Let R be a strongly clean ring.…”
Section: Clean Rings Vs Strongly Clean Ringsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The following example shows that the triangular matrix rings over local rings need not be strongly clean. We point out that T n (R) over a strongly π -regular ring R is strongly clean [17,20].…”
Section: Strongly Clean Triangular Matrix Ringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But A ∈ M 2 (R) is strongly clean by [6,Corollary 2.2]. It is worth noting that every strongly P -clean 2 × 2 matrix over integral domains must be an idempotent by Theorem 4.4.…”
Section: Strongly P -Clean Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%